You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

reskin

Unregistered

11

Thursday, June 23rd 2011, 9:12am

RE: RE: RE: RE: Virtual Rain Sensor

Still not going to cut it. On site collection of rain data is the only sure fire solution. Furthermore, your "local" weather station will typically not have the data required to run the Penman-Monteith equation, and even if it did, this data is also better collected on site.
You are missing the point. The whole idea is to leverage a nearby personal weather station (average of a $1000 investment) so that everyone doesn't need to make that investment. Most of the stations we have found have all the data we need (some don't have solar radiation so we look to the next nearest). All of them have relative humidity, temperature (and dew point), altimeter, anemometer, and elevation (the rainfall isn't actually used in the P-M equation but we use it to figure out how much we still need to water).

Rate this thread