Thank you for your reply! It gave me some confidence to call the contractor instead of trying to fix all the problems myself! But... (there's always a "but" in life's turmoil's isn't there?) When I talked to him over the phone, he told me that he was aware that he set the heads to hit the house, because the alternative would be to have about 5 feet of lawn go without water. (the 5 feet he is talking about is between the house, which has about 3 foot deep beds around the foundation, and the sprinkler heads... he located the heads approx 8-9 feet from the house itself, instead of 3 feet at the edge of the beds, where the lawn starts... so the 5 feet behind the head ((between the heads and the bed)) is where the lawn would get no water unless the heads rotate 360 degrees and pound the house... the lawn extends 35 feet beyond that and he did the same thing on the other side... located the heads about 5 feet in from the edge of the lawn???? Luckily on that side there is no house for the sprinklers to hit, just the next door neighbors cow pasture... which I seem to be irrigating part of for free...) I asked him why he located the heads where he did if he knew this would happen, and he told me that it was because I told him to keep the cost down as low as possible so he had to improvise. The lawn had already been seeded the previous fall, so it wasn't like he didn't know where the lawn stopped and started... And yes, I did tell him I didn't have a million dollars for an overly elaborate sprinkler system, but I did want one that worked properly! It was already expensive due to the size of my yard... So another $500.00 to $1,000.00 either way wouldn't have changed my mind in putting in a system. I did all of the backfilling of the trenches myself to save money, and he gave me a whopping $100.00 off. (if it were just dirt, backfilling the trenches would be no big deal, but given that there was already a lawn in place made the job worth more than $100.00.) ANYWAY... he said that there aren't any nozzles that will fix my problems, and suggested that I just extend the beds out another 5 feet. Or, when I get plants in my beds and my drip system set up... that I incorporate spray nozzles at the edge of the beds to irrigate that 5 feet of lawn that is now dead. (it is a new house, I don't even have plants in my beds yet, but they are already tilled, mounded with good soil, landscape fabric installed, barked, and edged... I'll get plants in them next year when I have enough money!) I never told him his price was way too much or anything... I just asked him to please let me do whatever I could (labor-wise) to save money, and that I wanted a system that was dependable, not overly elaborate, but not cheapo either! I didn't want to drag hose over 3 acres of property to make up for the area's the system didn't cover like I have to now!!! I don't know what to do or say at this point. He also told me he threw away the nozzles, and to go buy another key because he had just recently given all of his extras away to the last job he did because the woman had alzheimer's and he figured she'd have a problem remembering where she put them, so she needed a bunch. (now if that isn't sarcastic... I don't know what is...) Doesn't look like he is going to fix the problems without paying him more... and I don't want to do that... I'm not wild about the idea of extending the beds another 5 feet, because that means more money in plants, dirt, bark, effort, time... etc. so what would you suggest? Would sprayers linked to my future drip system take care of the 5 foot "dead" gap? The area that we are talking about here is on both long sides of my house, which is a total of 180 feet... and 1 short side that is 35 wide. So that is approximately 1100 sq feet. (Minus the area for the front entrance which is 25 feet wide.) He only allowed 1 station (or rather, 1 valve) to operate the entire drip system around the house, as he said that 1 valve could operate up to 2000 emitters... but from what I have read, it isn't a great practice to combin