You are not logged in.

Reply

Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

Attention: The last reply to this post was 3541 days ago. The thread may already be out of date. Please consider creating a new thread.

Message information
Message
Settings
Automatically converts internet addresses into links by adding [url] and [/url] around them.
Smiley code in your message such as :) is automatically displayed as image.
You can use BBCode to format your message, if this option is enabled.
Security measure

Please enter the letters that are shown in the picture below (without spaces, and upper or lower case can be used).

The first post

Tuesday, April 12th 2005, 6:36am

by Fairbanks

sprinkler heads and backflow valves

****o again,

This question involves my design I received back from orbitonline. The design they returned to me is quite complex. It uses numerous types of sprinkler heads in a complex arrangment. Is that normal to an untrained eye? My yard is 158 feet wide and 220 feet deep. My house is approx 95 feet wide including my walkout and retaining wall and 60 feet deep including the porches. There is about 20 feet of yard on the right side (looking from the road in front) and 20 feet on the left of the driveway. There is 70 feet of yard in front of my house and 85 feet in back.

My question is......why can't I just use one or two types of heads for my entire yard? For example.....one head with an output of 1.5 gallons per minute and 10 heads in a circuit equaling 15 gallons per minute. Does that make sense? I could use several circuits in my yard all equaling 15 GPM. Tell me how my reasoning is flawed please.

I am just trying to simplify the project in my mind at this time. I'm sure I will make it more complex before I dig....but would something like this work as long as I spread out the heads with head to head coverage?

Thanks,

Fairbanks