Reply
Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Attention: The last reply to this post was 4018 days ago. The thread may already be out of date. Please consider creating a new thread.
The last 10 posts
Actually.. this is the right one for my area.. I spoke to the town and water authority and they informed me of this... THanks for the info
I'd have to agree with Wet Boots on this one. Sure would hate for you to install the backflow and then come home and your water was off because it's not the right one for your municipality. Heck, here in Columbus there are at least six different variations on code and enforcement, all based on the municipal code.
Should you decide to go with it, another option is to use 3/4 into the bottom of the backflow and then use a 3/4 sweat x 1" MIPT copper adapter as your transition to 1" on the inlet side, then 1" out.
Based on what I've learned at www.irrigationtutorials.com, the only thing to consider between a 1" v. 3/4" backflow is pressure losses. Each backflow will have a different pressure loss graph (pressure loss v. flow rate). These graphs are NOT strait line graphs. They actually are very curvy, and frequently have a "sweet" spot where they lose the least amount of pressure. If the flow rate is higher or lower than the "sweet" spot, there will be a greater pressure loss. Now sometimes these pressure losses don't amount to much of anything, and if you've got pressure to spare, then you don't care. If you are borderline in having enough pressure to work with, then you'd want to review these pressure charts. Most manufaturers have them availible on their web sites. Well, I assume they do. When I was looking into WATT back flows, I had no problem finding them, and I THINK I even found Febco at one time too.
I'd say use it in good health, but if you haven't figured that out by now, I would be politely inquiring whether you actually know whether this gift backflow preventer is of a type that is actually approved for use in your state/town/whatever ~ A Febco 850 is a Double Check Valve Assembly, and those are not toxic-rated, and are therefore unusable where protection from possible toxic backflow is required. Learn what the plumbing codes/laws are where you live, then make your decision.
Sorry to be stupid about this. does that mean yes or no.. A friend of mine gave me a 1" today for free and wanted to know if it would be ok to use. i figured it should be fine since all valves and manifold are 1"..
About as much as it would hurt to use inch-and-a-half. Understand that many backflow preventers of the 3/4" and 1" sizes are actually identical castings, only differing by the size of the pipe thread and valves on the unit.
Three quarters. Backflow capacities are way beyond those of the pipe sizes they possess, just like water meters.
No.. the feed after the meter is 3/4".. I could change the T in the 3/4" and convert to 1".. or I could leave the current T which is 3/4" all around.. which way is best?
is it 1 inch coming into you back flow? It wont hurt to use 1".