You are not logged in.

Reply

Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

Attention: The last reply to this post was 4258 days ago. The thread may already be out of date. Please consider creating a new thread.

Message information
Message
Settings
Automatically converts internet addresses into links by adding [url] and [/url] around them.
Smiley code in your message such as :) is automatically displayed as image.
You can use BBCode to format your message, if this option is enabled.
Security measure

Please enter the letters that are shown in the picture below (without spaces, and upper or lower case can be used).

The last 3 posts

Wednesday, August 21st 2002, 8:44am

by whwork

After searching the web I did find several references on the subject. In general, placing an RPZ in a pit is not recommended. It is possible to place an RPZ given proper drainage. In several cases drainage must be to daylight i.e., a simple sump is not good enough.

In my town, Hollis, NH there is no regulation regarding placing an RPZ in-ground. In fact, there is no requirement that a backflow preventer is necessary at all. However, what may be required somewhere else probably makes good common sense everywhere elese.

To summarize, I plan on using an RPZ that is installed above-ground. Instead of an expensive enclosure, perhaps I will build a "dog house" like enclosure to match the house.

-WH


Monday, August 19th 2002, 6:13am

by whwork

Just read the installation specs from Febco. It states that some approval agencies do not permit the installation of an RPX in a pit. If the approval agency does permit it, then proper drainage must be provided to prevent cross-contamination.

This answers the question whether or not an RPZ can be installed underground.

The question still remains how large the sump should be. Could this be determined by calculating the total volume of water that would be in the mainline and all the laterals?

Best Regards,

Weber Hsiao


Monday, August 19th 2002, 6:02am

by whwork

putting an RPZ underground

I have been reading the past post regarding installing a Reduced Pressure backflow preventer inside and outside, but not underground. I would like to put RPZ outside and out-of-sight. Has anyone done this before?

I have seen that in commercial installations the RPZ is typically enclosed in a metal box that sits on top of a concrete pad. These metal boxes, however, very expensive ($500~$1000).

Is it possible to put an RPZ underground in a very large (bigger than a jumbo) valve box? The following conditions would be maintained:

condition-1) the RPZ will be at least 18" off the surface
condition-2) a sump to contain contain the backflow will be provided

If it is possible to install the RPZ underground, then have the following questions:

question-1) how big should the valve box be?
question-2) how large should be sump be?

Any input would be most appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Weber Hsiao